As I continue working on adding Meta parameters to my older WaveShapes, I can't help noticing that as I've been able to navigate through the occasional roadblock, the actual Meta docs (see "Rotating Corridor BTW) seem to contradict my observations.
For instance, the detail and density params supposedly rise commensurate to the complexity of the WaveShape in question. However, I've noticeg that for some Shapes that require a high Steps value (i.e. the "Sprockets" family of waveshapes), all you need is a value of 1 for both params aforementioned. Why is this? Is the Stps number supposed to compensate for this?
All I'm saying here is that the Documentation, although straighforward in its descriptions, is not to me as comprehensive or detailed (i.e. how the Meta relates to, say, the Steps or NUM_SAMPLE_BINS vaules) as it might otherwise be.
Am I making sense?
For instance, the detail and density params supposedly rise commensurate to the complexity of the WaveShape in question. However, I've noticeg that for some Shapes that require a high Steps value (i.e. the "Sprockets" family of waveshapes), all you need is a value of 1 for both params aforementioned. Why is this? Is the Stps number supposed to compensate for this?
All I'm saying here is that the Documentation, although straighforward in its descriptions, is not to me as comprehensive or detailed (i.e. how the Meta relates to, say, the Steps or NUM_SAMPLE_BINS vaules) as it might otherwise be.
Am I making sense?
